What is good in the article about what PS4 still does better than X1 is that they put the reason of PS4 games having better graphics than X1 is the faster memory and less reserve of gpu power (and that was already taken care off...), but assume that because of a few games parity is being achieved already (and avoid to say PS4 GPU is 50% stronger and have more ROPs, etc).
So to people saying this piece wasn't the work of a fanboy because the site posted on for PS4 needs to see how they tried to make the PS4 advantages lesser and reached for X1 advantages.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
