By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r said:
DonFerrari said:
Porcupine_I said:
curl-6 said:

Price isn't holding me back from Xbone, (or PS4) the lack of games that interest me is.

I'd buy them at their current price if either of them scored Monster Hunter 5 or Bioshock Next.

you mean you want some of them toxic AAA games?


Some people preffer that a company when charging US$60,00 for a game have a profit of let's say US$ 10,00 after selling 1-5M, but if they invest a lot of money and make a garbage doesn't salvage them.

Others preffer that a company charges US$ 60,00 without ever reducing the price and have a profit of US$ 50,00 selling 20M units...

Those toxic AAA is so bad to the industry that we preffer to be ripped off on low budget high hype games and fill the pocket of a single company.


What about people who dont care how much a company makes but just wants a good game?

They wouldn't complain of toxic AAA, small short indies or blockbusters with little inovation and just play the games he likes, I usually do that. But if someone thinks a game is toxic because of production cost demanding too much sale to break even he should complain of a game selling to much and costing little as ripoff shouldn't he?





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."