Value proposition. MCC vs. LoU remastered

[MikeRox]

spemanig said:

Teeqoz said:
I belive that when most people talk value, they don't talk about what one game is priced on PS compared to what the other game is priced on Xbox, I think they talk about the amount of playtime you'll get out of the game. If we go by that definition of value then Halo: MCC wins (I assume, since it's four games vs one).

That should be the only definition of value. You get exponancially more for your money. This shouldn't even be up for descussion. 4 games vs 1. The end.

Surely by that logic, RPGs are always better value for money than anything else though?

You can't quantify value. It's purely subjective, 4 games someone isn't interested in, in one compilation, isn't as good value as Daytona USA on PSN/XBL to someone who loves Daytona USA.

Surely by your logic, games like Little Big Planet and anything with a level creator offer by far the best value for money???