Cheebee said:
Seece said:
A) keep your quote trees down, B) never said you said WiiU was fine, I said you were suggesting it, which I stand by. Being up YoY means nothing when it's still incredibly low numbers. Barely making a profit, meaning they can't cut the price without incurring a loss does not = good news for Nintendo. Good news would be if they were profiting on it last year and could think about making a cut later this year. Remember we're talking about this years sales/sales going forward.
Some XB1 fans thought it'd be "the saviour" definitely not all, but XB1 has the benefit of having third and first party games that will push sales throughout its life, Titanfall will prove to be one of the weaker hardware pushers when all is said and done, MK will be one of WiiU's strongest, yet Titanfall will still have sold more consoles. Also, numbers are estimates and adjusted. Just like Nintendo fans who were happy about the 187k week, that got adjusted down to 130k.
BenV has already said XB1 is above PS4 since the cut in the US. So I would wait for more solid evidence before suggesting XB1 is below WiiU.
Xbox is fine in the long run is what I'm saying, they have a pro active company behind it, third party, a clearly defined audience and price manuverability, 4 very important things Nintendo do not.
|
Literally none of this changes anything about what I said before, in the slightest. And your last sentence is true, I never ever claimed otherwise, anywhere. I was talking about the current situation, which is why I used words like 'now'. Anyone can cherrypick and spin, it's not changing anything. My original posts still stands.
|
My posts are aimed at the narrative of your posts, suggesting WiiU is fine and XB1 isn't, already explained that. Can see what your intentions are like night and day.
It's like me saying MS makes $5b a Q and Nintendo are losing money. What has it actually got to do with sales going forward.
Moderated - Mr Khan
