KBG29 said:
Firstly, 1920 x 1200 with ultra settings has not been 60fps consistantly on even high end GPU's. This requires turning off some settings to reach even on flagship cards. It would also require yearly updates to the flagship card to pull off this feat in the handful of titles it is possible in. The yearly battlefield, and COD will start to drop about 15 - 20% of the previous years fps. If you go to more PC exclusive titles like Company of Heroes, they will never reach 1080p/60fps with ultra settings. Secondly, even if these consoles had i7 + Titan Black or FX 9000 + R9 290x on a APU with 16GB of stacked RAM, and 1TB transfer rates, they still would not be 1080p/60fps consistantly. Developers will always push the envelope, not matter how much power they are given. The fact is 30fps is perfectly fine, and so it will always be the bar. 60fps will only be in select titles were a developer sets that as the foundation the game is built upon. Anything over 60fps will never be on consoles as it is completely pointless. |
Who said anything about Ultra Settings? If you're going to run a game in ultra settings I think it's pretty reasonable you're going to take a FPS hit, that's a given. Unless you spent thousands and thousands of dollars to have the highest possible performance and graphics, but those people are few. As for Company of Heroes will never run at 1080p 60fps at ultra, where on Earth did you get that from?
Secondly, that's a given. You can have all the power in the world but if the game is optimised like crap then of course it's going to run like crap. And really 30 fps has always been the bar? Since when? And yeah, it is pointless to display over 60 fps because I doubt many people own a TV that can display more than 60 hz.