By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Roar_Of_War said:
Never said:
Roar_Of_War said:

City. It's become cult popular to say the first game, but City is objectively better.

Asylum doing a few things better =//= a better game overall. And it's bosses were terrible.

Not to say Asylum is a bad game, because it's actually great. But people feel more attachment to it because it was the first great Batman game in a long time.


Of course, somebody has a differing opinion to you therefor they must be saying it because they're following some popular trend and not expressing on honest opinion how much they enjoyed (Or didn't enjoy) the game...Well that's a little condicending.

It's true that a lot of people who say the first game are following popular trend, and true that a lot of people are attached to it because it's the first in the series/nostalgic.

Just because a case can exist where my generalization is untrue does not make my statement incorrect. I'm claiming this is the majority, regardless of the minority scenarios.

People only say city because of the hype and the irrational assumption that anything with an open world is better even if it doesnt add anything to the expiriance.
See how easy that is?
Your genelisation is nothing but the baseless opinion of an armchair expert. You have no reason to assume that most people who prefer Arkham asylum are doing it for any reason other than honest prefrence.

Claims of peoples judgment being biased through nostalgia are common when disgusing games, but I have to say with only a 2 year gap between these games this could be one of the most exteme uses of that argument I've heard.