By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Leadified on 16 June 2014
Edit Thread
Orepheus said:
Leadified said:
Orepheus said:
Leadified said:


Two wrongs don't make a right. We could blame MS all day for what they started but in reality what matters is both Sony and MS have these exclusive or time exclusive deals now which are just bad policies that hurt gamers and gaming as a whole.

Sony had zero choice but to react, MS was buying all the exclusive content, Sony had to counter.....If MS never joins the console market this crap never exists.

You can use the same argument to "justify" what Microsoft did last gen. Saying that MS had no choice but to buy all the content to break Sony's PS2 monopoly so Xbox had a fair chance to play. Being apologetic about the situation doesn't really change that the whole multiplat timed exclusive/console exclusive thing is bad for gaming. 


You don't even know what a monoploy is...sony certainly has never had one. Windows is a monopoly, PLaystation is not. In other words your argument is, MS does it good, Sony bad, gotcha. Sony had no choice, it is a shit practice, but sony had to counter. Last gen early on the consensus was buy for Xbox it always had extra content,  It started with MS and COD maps, exclusive content and horse armour in Oblivion.

You are being apolgetic to MS, works both ways, MS started this crap.

I'm glad you agree with my point that it's a shit practice, but I find it interesting how you somehow came to the conclusion that I'm somehow defending Microsoft or how I think it's okay when MS does it. It sounds like you clearly missed the point of my example. I'm also really unsure what you are trying to argue with me here.