LiquorandGunFun said:
Since you ask. Vita needs cheaper ones that is for sure, http://business.financialpost.com/2014/05/27/nintendo-announces-new-youtube-affiliate-program-focused-on-getting-ad-revenue-from-fan-videos/ Get approved by nintendo to do reviews. That is bullshit shitty. |
No you can make reviews etc. you are just not supposed to be a dumb parasite which is not the case when you actually offer quality content (something of value) because you will be accepted as a partner. Even if you review Zelda and give it a 7/10 Nintendo wont kick you out.
But since Nintendo can obviously not know every single person that does reviews and can even less differentiate between stuff like gamexplain vs 12 year old idiot playing games this program seperates the wheat from the chaff. TBH The less useless shit is on youtube the better.
I want to see lets watchers etc. stream 2h of a hollywood movie with using the bluray's menu etc (remote control input can be compared to controller input on a console) and nonsensical voice overs without geting in trouble. Hollywood will make their youtube accounts go the way of the dodo or sue them.
I am 100% pro youtube program and 100% against people getting money without doing much. I mean I can make a small logo and intro in photoshop/sony vegas within 5 minutes and then I can play my games but that doesnt make me entitled to any kind of profit.
If you do something that has value like gamexplain / the bitblock etc. becoming a partner is easy. If everything you do is playing games without quality content well your problem. There is still some good lets players out there but 90% are redundant. Quality lets players and speed runners and reviewers will become partners easily so I see no problem at all.
But enough of that thats off-topic.
Still a dick move by MS.
