iron_megalith said:
selnor said:
Salamursu said:
There's better technology available all the time, but it does not mean that console generations should be abandoned just to implement every new component available. What would be the point in the console business if new generations were introduced every three years. |
I agree. But the jump next year isnt just like Geforce 7 to 8 or Pentium 3 to 4. This is a radical new way of making games a whole lot more powerful. The numbers they are able to crunch are massive. There is no longer need for a seperate graphics card. My point is this gen will be no longer than any other generation. And because of the jump next year it applys moreso to this gen than any other. PS3 and 360 are supposed to be the forefront of HD graphical gaming . But there will be a massive gap next year and especially 2010, 2011 when we see games take advantage of the change.
|
Please stop trolling and use your head. Please don't say you said that from the heart because it doesn't give a damn point at all. Are you telling us that in 2009 ps3 is obsolete and game devs won't be developing games there anymore? You make ps3 sound like the 1st Xbox. |
What he's saying is that by 2010, the PS3 will be vastly inferior graphically to PC gaming. And he's right. PCs are already doing things the PS3 & 360 can't and in two years, the gap will be huge.
