By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Captain_Tom on 15 June 2014
Edit Thread
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Pristine20 said:

Go play MGS4, and then go play Far Cry 3 on PS3.  Then tell me if you can't tell the difference.  I recently found out my monitor can be run at above 100 FPS, and so I tried it...  The difference was immediately apparent to me, similar to the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.

I own MGS4 but have never played Far Cry 3. Which one is 60 FPS?

Wait I take it back... It seems MGS4 has a variable framerate (I mostly played online where 60 fps was the standard).  Hmmmmm.  MGSV is rock solid 60 FPS on PS4, or you could play RAGE on PS3 as it is also crazy solid at 60 FPS.

Sadly, I neither possess nor have any interest in the games you've listed. Maybe this is why I still don't see the need for 60 fps. Afterall, all my games are 30 fps and they're pretty good games. My favorite FPS to date is KZ2, a 30 fps game and people say that genre needs 60 fps the most

KZ2 is a classic that met my crazy high expectations!  But yeah lol idk what to tell ya then.  Play the MGS series though!  Best series made!


Yup, it proves right there that you don't need 60 fps to make a great game. KZ:SF tried to have 60 fps, the final product is a mess with constant framerate drops. I do have MGS4 and have wathed my cousin play through the other MGS games. Are they all 60 fps?


First of all, 60 FPS is not required, but it always makes a game better.  Period.  Now as for KZ:SF, I have it and the Framerate is far from a mess.  I will take unlocked any day of the week over 30 FPS because when it is 50-60 FPS in close quarters areas, I have the advantage over people who use 30 fps.

Also not every MGS is 60 FPS.  MGS2 is a rock solid 60 fps though.  Play the HD collection of MGS2 and 3... You will see!

P.S.  Or you could just build a budget PC too ;)