I played "The Order 1886"

[VanceIX]

DakonBlackblade said:

TheBoneCollector said:

DakonBlackblade said:

VanceIX said:
So pretty much what everyone's been saying- great visuals but mediocre/average gameplay.

He said gameplay was good and he wanted to play more but its a familiar gameplay wich is obvious caus ethey are trying to be a 3rd person shooter it doesnt have to be inovative just fun, ppl realy need ot stop waiting for inovations everytime a new game comes out, its not possible.

Agree it's stupid, if that's how we judeg games how many are good? Barely any games are innovative, play games because you enjoy them period.

Thank you kind sir my point exactly. Under the non inovative gameplay imediatilly means crap idea we have to put on the crap list games like Uncharted, Gears and God of War, Halo, Dark Souls 1 and 2 (obviously didnt inovate, Demons Souls plays exactly the same), Skyrim, Forza, Gran Turismo, every sport game in the planet, pretty much every fighting game and like 1 million other games.

All the games you listed originally had unique or fun gameplay when they were first released (or at least the IP was).

The Order looks like a prettier version of the standard linear third person shooters. The non-interactive theatrical gameplay and quicktime events aren't helping either.