By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Daisuke72 on 13 June 2014
Edit Thread
fighter said:
Daisuke72 said:
fighter said:
Daisuke72 said:

 

 

Objectively having a better resolution and framerate doesn't make a game look better tho, art direction which is subjective is another thing. But overall presentation is another. The Naughty Dog trailer looks like CGI, many people do not believe it's running in real time. If the game is in fact running in real time, then one can assume it's at a level comparable to CGI, I have yet to see anyone say Crysis 3 which does look good, looks like CGI. 

please define "overall presentation" presentation then

let's see if your definition is neither that of "numbers" or art direction.

I don't know the work behind the UC4 trailer nor the technical details so I can't really say what makes it look as good as it does to me. In MY opinion it looks clear and cut above everything else I've seen, as it the presentation looks like CGI, Idk whether that's on the technical side or art style side, because I have yet to play the game. But if those are in-game graphics, depsite only being 1080P 60FPS with a realistic art style, it looks better than anything I've ever seen before. The texture work, the lighting, the animations etc all look superb.

so you can't define an "overall presentation" that would be something more than the combination of art direction or "numbers"?

character animations, texture work, atmosphere and etc has nothing to do with "numbers' nor art style, rather than overall presentation and talent.