By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
torok said:
Probably. People saying Skyrim with mods are just out of their mind, Skyrim isn't a good looking game and loses to even the 2007 Crysis. Witcher 2 doesn't look nowhere as good as this trailer, so we will have to expect the W3 and see what happens.

People should actually expect console games to deliver graphics that won't be seen on PC with their exclusives until at least 2016. The PS4 and X1 GPUs are decently beefy while more powerful PC GPUs are usually using more than one GPU, like Titan, a configuration that isn't efficient. DirectX is another problem because a high-end PC does several times less draw calls because of the bad middleware. Actually, most PC and PS4 games from today don't look as good as UC3 (of course, Crysis games and Watchers looks better, as an example). High end AAA games usually look better than almost everything available on any platform.


Very misleading stuff you have said here. Especially saying that PS4/X1 Gpus are beefy. This alone is one of the most misinformed statements I've seen anyone say so far. Both gpus are extremely weak, the ps4 uses a modified Radeon 7870 gpu. That definitely isn't beefy. With respect to DX, AMD has Mantle. M$ has DX12 both which are the same as low level apis found in consoles. 

Your perception of what you feel looks good is limited in spectrum. Due to the fact that what makes a game good graphically is quite broad. You can't expect a mmorpg to look like Crysis 3 since the game is generally pushing around many many more npcs than what you will find in a fps. Gw2 is praised for its graphics initially but technically speaking the character models aren't even better than U2. But the standards and requirements are different since the genre is different.