prayformojo said:
Conegamer said:
| prayformojo said:
As well as seal it's fate amoung hard core gamers. If you care about Nintendo as I do, the last thing you need is more "it's kiddy" BS.
|
So? Regardless of what Nintendo announced today these comments would still be flying around.
What matters to me at least is that the games look amazing; if others disagree then fine but I'll just be playing and enjoying the games.
|
No offense, but don't you think that's a bit selfish? It's much more important to the health of Nintendo for Zelda to sell really well and get good press (social media and online communities make up half of a games success these day. Just look at Titanfall for example) than it is to create a game that a small fanbase is going to enjoy.
|
Which Zelda game hasn't had these things? I guess the DS titles didn't have the high reviews that other titles had, but both WW and SS were highly acclaimed by the video game media. Hell, almost too much so for the case of SS, in my opinion. This is obviously a huge transition for the Zelda series. To simplify things to that of art style really shows a lack of knowledge of what sells Zelda games and why people buy them. If Nintendo succeeds in bringing an Open-World 3d Zelda game with innovative gameplay mechanics to the forefront, the media will eat it up. If the media could adore SS's 480p jaggy picture, certainly they can swallow a far more excellent (as far as visuals are concerned) game.
