Richard_Feynman said:
Would you like a list of technological applications that were discarded due to the exact same reasoning as you've applied here? That's rhetorical because I don't want to discuss this with someone who uses "back in my day" arguments. And my age has nothing to do with it. I've used OR - and looked at the source code that came along with it. I literally just finished a 2 year study of a C++ toolkit used at the most notable research facilities in the world. It is not unreasonable for me to claim that I am in step with technology and computers. This technology is new, exciting and offers incredible possibilities. I know this for a fact - economic success or not. So I have no need to listen to this "old man talk". |
If there was sometime in modern history any new tech would catch on it was in the 1990s. Money was everywhere, jobs were plenty, the stock market had only one direction - upwards. All the tech we take for granted now started their commercial success in the 90s: Cell phones, laptops, PCs, flatscreen TVs, Internet, touch screens MS, Google, GPS etc. The hype for VR was way bigger than now, and I referred to your age because, though you were a boy, you might remember how it was. You and I was old enough to remember the before and after of this revolution. That the VR graphics in hindsight looks blocky and crude did not lessen the hype. Everyone saw what was there and found it to be sufficient to build a business on. All other tech has moved on and developed and have become cheaper and smaller. The VR was dead and burried until Kickstarter came along.
If VR will make it this time is probably not a question of technology but more of sociology and business models. If Google Glass with all the hype and money resources have a hard time beeing accepted I find it hard to think that a VR device will be more hip.
There will be an audience among the geek community but for it to become really big and important and get all the games it deserves it has to attract a bigger audience than that.
The technology is OK - almost nobody questions that - but the question is if it will attract enough of non-techies.







