Why does Watch Dogs help PS4 but do nothing for XB1

[Scisca]

dane007 said:

I would glady take Titanfall over KZ  . i got both and the smoothness you get with titanfall make it hard to go back to kz in my opinion. KZ game is still fun to play in terms of single player campaign. Well based on what games was available at launch ,, i chose and bought XO first before i got PS4.  For me future doesn't matter as i get all eventually. but i know for most budget gamers ,, they would pick a console with games that like or games that htey know will come to a specific consoles. 
Can't comment on WII U as i haven't purchased it yet.  Thats opinion and great that you prefer sony first party exclusives over XO.  I prefer  Xo exclusives more but both have good exclusives like ISS which for me is the best first Party AAA on ps4  . XO will get japanese games much like 360 did. X360 did get japanese games that ps3 didn't get either and both had japanese games that came on both platforms. so don't know what you are talking about.  they were recent news of XO getting three japanese exclusives and one to be announced in the upcoming E3. WD looks similar on oth consoles. Even DF did the analysis.  me an my brother got copies of the game and they look identical.( i got XO and he got PS4) The only difference is the small resolution boost, slightly  more screen tearing on XO which rarely happens.  Apart from that its identical. don't know where you get the better lookin game ,, unless you are talking about resolution?  Sure there are gamers who would pick ps4 version purely on those tiny difference which is fine by me.

"Anyone who wants to get the most out of their money chooses PS4." Again thats your opinion not fact. 

@Bold - this doesn't matter. As I've said, both games are bad. At least KZ is a true exclusive, but that also doesn't matter much. They are both bad and thus make no difference.

@Italics - this is not an opinion. MS has nothing on Sony's first parties. Even if the quality can be comparable is the case of the flagship games, the number of such games can't even be compared. MS can't and won't pump out as many great and diverse games as Sony does. This is not an opinon, it's a fact backed up by years of track record. It is your opinion that you like MS games more, but the fact that Sony's offer is larger, more diverse and better (this last criterion I base on metacritic ratings, which are higher for Sony PS3 exclusives than X360's exclusives). It's a given that this will repeat this gen, cause Sony's 1st parties > MS 1st parties.

@ Japanese games - yeah, MS bought a handful of games at the start of last gen. It wasn't worth it, if they really want to repeat it, they'll be just losing money again. Also XO is no X360 and is even less attractive for Japanese devs.

@underlined - if there are differences, the games aren't identical. Yes, higher resolution and less screen-tearing make for a better looking game, that's exactly what better graphics consist of. An extra 60 minutes of gameplay also makes a big difference and makes the PS4 version higher value for your money. These games ARE NOT identical. The PS4 version is superior and you get more for your money. Fact.

 

dane007 said:

"Anyone who wants to get the most out of their money chooses PS4." Again thats your opinion not fact. 

This is not an opinon, it's a fact. You pay less for a more powerful hardware - fact. Even with the Kinectless version you get more HP per $1 with the PS4 ;) When you buy WD you get better visuals (and will get them better from other 3rd party games as well) and an extra hour of gameplay for the same price - fact. You will get more 1st party games on PS4 than on XO and Sony won't abandon the support as fast as MS, the games will have better graphics than MS 1st party games - I would say it's a fact, though it's "only" an assumption with a 99.(9)% of chance of becoming true. Good enough for me.