| alabtrosMyster said: A few points are off in your analysis below the tables (probably because of bias?): 1 - The xb1 does not have "about the same titles + more exclusives" it has about half the games the PS4 has and a few exclusives, but nothing major (is anyone still playing Titanfall?) ... for the rest of the year they have the same number of first party exclusives + PS4 has about twice as many games announced over all... you can slide and dice the list however you want it, go look on IGN's announced games list... there are 3 pages for PS4 and 1.5 page for XB1! Anyway, I will not sort out the list of exclusives, but PS4 has the same numer if you cound only the first party, and much more if you cound all games... even F2P and "indies". 2 - The cross platform titles all run better on the PS4, or at the very least the less demanding games run about the same on both, this is why people who wanted to play the game and were not on next gen systems bought PS4s to play it, this really is a no brainer, unless you already have an XB1, why would you pick the inferior version? 3 - The redeeming factor for the moth of May for XB1 is that they announced a price drop for June 9th a couple of weeks ago, so they may have some built-up sales in June for that week... a certain number of people have been waiting for a kinect free XB1 for a while! 4 - Wii U got a huge bump from Mario Kart 8! Now I still think the Wii U is grossly overpriced for what it has to offer, Nintendo should do a version of the system they sell for 250$ with a 500GB internal drive + the classic controller instead of the one with the second screen.... I may get it for Zelda, if it seems to be any good. |
I'm glad you didn't explain it in a black and white point of view like the OP. Glad to see context behind obvious situations.
