Ryse would be praised if it was by Quantic Dream.

[Normchacho]

Mr Puggsly said:

Normchacho said:

I think the problem here is that you're mistaking your opinion of the two games as the general consenus. Beyond was better reviewed and has a much higher user score on metacritic because people thought it was better.

I've already pointed out that QD has a better track record than Crytek so people aren't just used to bad games from them. There really isn't anything that could be done to help Ryse get better reviews without improving the game.

You say Ryse is a bad game as its an objective statement. Yet you feel my feelings toward Beyond if subjective. Funny how that works.

A lot of people on this forum thought Beyond had a worse critical reception than it actually did... because many know its bad game.

QD has a small record and their last step was a misstep, a bigger misstep than Crysis 3 even.

Ok let me rephrase, the genearal consensus as well as my own conclusion with the game is that Ryse is a bad game. It is not the general consensus that Beyond is worse.

A 70 is bad especially considering how well the last game was recieved and how much hype was surounding the game before it came out. But! you said it youself, it has an 84 for user reviews so obviously many people don't think it's bad. 

Saying Beyond was a big mistep works against your point because you said people expected a bad game from QD and not from Crytek. The Critical reception of Beyond being such a large drop from previous games by them disproves that point.

How do you think Ryse would have been reviewed if it was made by QD?