By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r on 06 June 2014
Edit Thread
walsufnir said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
walsufnir said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
walsufnir said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
lol... how will all the xbox fans who couldnt stand to see DC at 30fps cope with this now?.


Several reasons, mainly: The first Horizon had 30fps locked. And with locked meaning no single frame ever dropped. Second the special treatment for input delay and physics update done at 360hz which is seldom to never found in other racing games rendering 30fps.


Yeah but why would you even assume DC wont be locked at 30 and that only devs who work on forza horizon are capable of "special treatment"? Hardly a convincing argument.


Who did? But actually a lot of people assumed H2 is going to be bad because cross-gen. Why?

Seriosly though PG have a (very good) record with H1 so assuming locked 30fps and very good refresh for everything else is much safer than in DC but of course not locked out. And I don't want to convince you as this is impossible given your record.

If you didnt then what else could the reply with 'reasons' mean?


H1 was a 30fps game so the second one was expected to be 30fps. Plus the first one didn't really feel like a 30fps game as I explained above. And the devs were never targeting or teasing 60fps - this is also different to 60fps.

And in what way is the expectations of the developers related to how gamers feel about playing a racing game at 30fps? the only connection I see here is psychological where you are assuming people think a game aiming for 60 and settling for 30 is worse than a game that never claims what they were targeting and then announced it was 30 which is the most BS ive heard.