| Richard_Feynman said:
Name them. Go on - I dare you "Also, in terms of qualiy, Watch_Dogs has not received amazing reviews. " Did you see me underline good? The WHOLE point is they DON'T have to be amazing to sell well. "How can the people who bought it have known that it would be a good game? " Two things: 1. Anyone with a little bit of sense knew it would (at the least) be good. 2. It wasn't that incredible yet it got those sales. "Infamous is as good of a game as Watch_Dogs according to reviewers (meta) and users (average scores). Yet it sells less" inFamous was on ONE platform. By how much is WD outselling it on PS4? "Watch_Dogs was hyped since it was shown" So what? Here's my point (which you obviously seem to have lost track of): Hey Mr. Publisher, if you made a good game for mid 2014 and gave it some publicity then chances are it would have made you a little richer. "Ask Ninty fans and Pikmin 3 or Wonderful 101. Great games, yet disappointing sales despite the long droughts. " Ignoring the fact that I am very, very well aware of those cases which is why I said X1/PS4. Not to mention that Wii U is failing. Or that Pikmin hardly has a huge fanbase. Or that Wonderful 101 (however good it may be) launched with a small user base and was yet another (aesthetically) kiddy game on Nintendo hardware. And how much advertisement did W101 get? Now try and twist my words any way you like, but I proclaim that every single one of your comments have been nonsensical from the outset... EDIT: Ok maybe the last bit was too much. |
"I dare you"? Seriously? What is this? kindergarten? You have all my respect, so do not quote me ever again. I refuse to waste my time replying to someone who uses flamebait comments. I will not reply in kind.
I don't want to derail this thread, so this is my last comment: well done, Ubisoft! Here's hoping Ninty is inspired and comes up with another lengedary series.
