oniyide said:
Mr Khan said:
oniyide said:
Because they dont NEED to, your theory is silly especially since we KNOW that MS has exclusive advertising with Xbox, been like that for years. ITs still funny how some people hold on to their conspiracy theories. Wii U version accounts for less than 1% of overall sales, laughable. Why would they even waste time with that? Hell be happy its even coming at all, Wii U fans know it is they will buy it if they want to and judging by the sales they really dont want to.
|
Right, and i'm just wondering if, as part of that advertising deal, Activision must delay announcement of versions for Nintendo platforms? It could be that Microsoft tried to get Activision to run it as a pretend exclusive (again, as a part of this advertising deal), but given the sales parity with PS, Activision said no, so they just settled with excluding Nintendo platforms.)
|
SMH, youre still wrong. MS has been trying to have it pretend exclusive for years now. Thing is the PS version STILL doesnt get adveritsed. period. Coverage is not advertisment. you dont see PS logos on TV commercials or billboards. Hell xbox is still the only platforms that gets DLC FIRST. Guys really need to stop playing the Ninty is the victim card, they are not in this case.
|
Think it through: advertising only comes from Microsoft, but not the actual console announcements. It could be an issue that Microsoft tried to get the very announcements buried, but that Activision refused for PS due to the revenue received there, but agreed to go MS-exclusive advertising while burying the very existence of the Nintendo versions.
This *did* start in 2010 when that MS/Activision deal first surfaced, after all.
