By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hynad said:
MikeRox said:


I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. For me it's up there. I know it's nowhere near as technically demanding on the hardware (hence why the Wii U is running it) but from how it looks on the screen it's roughly on the same level. Now, how a game like MK8 could look on PS4 hardware is a very exciting prospect. It's a shame no one else makes those sorts of games anymore.


Just the fact that MK8 is an aliasing fest while Infamous has one of the best AA in a console game ever just makes the comparison completely ridiculous. Since you agree about one game being technically superior, I won't get further than that (open world VS racing, for example)...

Now, while one runs at 30pfs and the other at 59, that doesn't shake the fact that one looks crystal crisp while the other is a jaggies fest. Yes, it still looks good, but they're not in the same ball park. It's a shame Nintendo couldn't implement proper AA for that game. But I know that you don't notice them as much after playing the game for a while. But the point still stands.

just by looking a direct feed screens you can clearly see infamous looks a generation ahead of mario kart 8, yea mario kart 8 looks better in motion but when your not moving and focus on the graphics it looks exactly like those direct feed pics, of course while your racing, moving fast you won't notice this jaggies, average textures and low poly count as much.