MikeRox said:
spadesrole said:
MikeRox said:
Well, having played the game now, I'm able to fully comment.
Yes "jaggies" are noticeable in the game. If that's something you find detracting it may be an issue for the game. However I think it looks absolutely stunning and I kind of like the crispness of the visuals that is given due to no AA. (it doesn't look like everything is through a soft filter). However if sacrificing AA was for 60fps. TOTALLY WORTH IT. I'd take the smoothness any day over softer visuals.
To me MK looks fantastic. That duplicate frame every 64 frames is noticible, but only if you look for it. Overall as someone with both a PS4 and Wii U, I have to say I'd be happy with the visuals on MK8 if it was one of my PS4 games. Infamous is more technically impressive thanks to how much more is going on, but Mario Kart 8 is certainly in the same league from aesthetics. |
mario kart should not be compared to infamous, the graphics in infamous are on a whole different level in every catagory except framrate. mario kart is just not a techically impressive game,every direct feed pics of mario kart 8 i have looked at, shows average textures, low poly models, bad IQ and jaggies. honestly it's not even top tier for a 7th gen game tech wise.
|
I can assure you that those screen shots bare no resemblence to how it looks in motion.
|
I know, right?
Those pics look like a Star Fox game. They look nothing like Mario Kart 8.
-__-
Seriously though, as great as MK8 looks, it's not in the same league as Infamous. That doesn't mean Mario Kart 8 can't be pleasing to the eyes.
