gergroy said:
GribbleGrunger said:
Seece said: You can't tell us not to talk about the authenticity of the site GribbleGrunger. Me and others (and even mods if you look up) all have a valid right to question where they're getting their numbers from |
By all means question where they're getting their numbers from. I do that too. I've never once said don't question the numbers, so I'm not sure why you've veered into uncharted territory.
|
I'm just curious, why do you even frequent the site? Its pretty a unprofessional site, with a fairly obvious bias, it just screems to most people not to be taken seriously...
Most of the numbers they say they get from "inside sources" could easily be derived from forums on the internet... It just doesnt seem like a good source of information at all... So why do you like it so much?
|
I don't frequent the site. I just post it if it pops up on N4Gs. I post other articles from N4Gs all the time too. I neither 'like' it nor 'dislike' it, I'm 'indifferent' to it.