soulfly666 said:
spemanig said:
soulfly666 said:
LMAO. Hey, we should all go into threads and openly admit to not playing the game the thread is based on, then talk badly about the game, stating 100% untrue things like it is generic and not worth the entry price, and then maintain our opinion of said game we have never played is totally valid.
|
I don't need to play a game to know if I think it's worth buying at it's current asking price.
|
Right, but just because you personally don't think the game is worth buying at its current asking price based on whatever non game playing experience reasons you have, doesn't mean in any way that the game actually isn't worth buying at its current asking price. Anyone could say that about any game that doesn't interest them. And this game isn't generic at all which you wouldn't know as you haven't played it. Everything you said in this thread has zero validity or basis as you have never once played the game. If you openly admit to not playing a game but then talk down on it, you should expect to be called out accordingly.
|
I've seen gameplay. I know how the game plays. It looks generic and not worth $60. I've seen reviews that talk in depth about the game. They all tell me things that make it obvious that it isn't worth $60. I'm not going to buy a game just to prove to some random that I have credebility in my opinion of a game, and I'm not going to even get into how I shouldn't have to prefice everything I say with "in my opinion" just so people like you don't get the wrong idea. I've played a hundred and one games like Wolfenstein, and I think it's just a generic shooter. I'm sorry, but dual wielding and stealth segments don't change that. And being a good generic shooter doesn't change it either.
Maybe I'll eat my words though. Maybe I'll eat crow. In five months. When it's $20.
