I just want to state that sometimes that rural area/high ownership rates and urban/low can be flipped on its head.
Where I live it's a big deal if we have 1 murder every few years. So I feel no real desire or need to own one. I don't hunt and I don't feel endangered when I go in public. The extent of any gun I would own would be for target practice and I would just rather play Battlefield and spend hundreds on video games instead.
If I lived in a big city with a high murder rate I would me much more inclined to buy a nice pistol. But I'm still of the mindset that everyone having more guns and being allowed to carry then everywhere would not really help anything, probably make things worst. I definitely wouldn't want the drunk angry asshole in the bar next to me packing.
But that's the thing about this whole debate. A subjectively small number of people believe in ultimate unquestionable gun ownership with no restrictions . A small number of people, liberals included, believe we should just ban guns completely. But whenever these arguments come up most people go at it from one of those two stances.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
