By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JPL78 said:
SocialistSlayer said:
JPL78 said:

That goes both ways. I remember at the hearings Ted Cruz saying a foregrip was "just a piece if plastic" and all these attachments on guns are purely cosmetic. Now I'm not mister gun knowledge but as a gamer I understand that a foregrip gives you extra stability most commonly associated with reducing recoil and increasing accuracy across successive fast rounds.

So both liberals and conservatives are ignorant about things. Either that or being purposefully misrepresentative. I wouldn't really take stock in what any of them say. I mean, you do realize those liberal politicians you hate voted AGAINST all recently purposed gun control right?

it doesnt really give you stability rather just comfort. it is essentially a piece of plastic, one that aids in comfortablility and not much else.

Ive shot numerous weapons and have qualified up to 500 yds, every time the Marine Corps has issued me an M-16, it has been without a foregrip.

You would make a good politician :)

i take that as a compliment.

but what i said still holds true. as someone who fancys himself as a firearms enthusist, I cant really notice any determinable difference when firing with or without a foregrip, other than the angle of my hand being slightly more comfortable with the grip.

i do have something called the grip-pod which is both a foregrip and a bi-pod, that helps me when i shoot in the prone posistion