Pristine20 said:
SocialistSlayer said:
Pristine20 said:
-CraZed- said:
badgenome said: He also killed half of his victims with a knife. Who's up for some knife control? |
Me. We also need more automobile control, starting with those evil BMWs, as he killed at least one of his victims with his Beamer.
|
You pro-gun folks sometimes make some really ridiculous arguments. A car's purpose is transportation. A gun's purpose is to kill efficiently. Everything cancause death. Now I don't think a gun ban really solves anything but you guys need to stop these useless comparisons. FYI, you won't win a war with the U.S. govt no matter how many guns you stash. Best case scenario is a bloodbath with 10X the casualties on the civillian side.
|
thats simply untrue
|
How so? You'd have to provide much more detail than that if you want to refute a point.
|
there are many guns not specifically designed to kill, let alone effieciently. You also have to take into account the type of bullet used. There are a multitude of things guns and ammunition are designed for