TheCallofKhtulu said:
sales2099 said:
Uncharted 1 in 2007 could have been estimated based on their previous work. Comparing Jak and Daxter to Last of Us makes no sense. You estimate Last of Us based on the Uncharted series. You base Uncharted 2 and 3 on their predesessor. Get it?
Previews are supposed to be positive. They can also be impartial and neutral. Reviews are where the critical aspects come in. Look. I took what the dev did in the last 4 years and also what other racers are pulling in. There is some ground for my estimation.The game is gorgeous but that won't save it if it doesn't have real substance.
|
Your making up crap, previews are not supposed to be positive, many are negative, and are a persons impressions good or bad, there are many mixed or bad previews out there.
|
Well I am entitled to my opinion, and I at least showed I have some grounds for it. Nothing wrong with a high 70's meta.....thats actually very good.
It is ok to hype realistic metas. Don't let exclusivity cloud your judgement. I personally hyped Titanfall in the high 80's because I knew lacking a campaign would hold it back. I was right because I didn't get blindly into the hype and logically predict based on the facts given. Just saying.
Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.
