AnthonyW86 said:
I don't really get what you're aiming at here. You're saying the Wii-U's design is more efficient than even AMD's newest gpu's? Or that from any major chip company for that matter? The chip is based on (older)AMD technology and considering the power draw the numbers given are the maximum possible. Sure they are calculated and not reported number by Nintendo, but If they deviate in any way from the actual numbers the real numbers could only end up lower. Nintendo can't defy the laws of physics. Based on the die photo's the core has an configuration of 320:16:8. Again if the numbers actually different they could only be lower, higher doesn't fit on the chip and would consume more power. |
We know there are basically just 2 possibilities of why Nintendo haven't announced the power of the graphics card. First is that they don't think they are competing against Sony/MS and so the number don't matter, or they know that releasing the number would make everybody know for sure that their console is weaker and that could harm them... In no way that prevents us to be sure WiiU is a lot weaker, we had several devs saying it would range from less powerfull than PS360 to slightly more powerfull... but always on the same ballpark.
No dev ever compared it to PS4/X1 because that would be idiot.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







