By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
game_on said:
AnthonyW86 said:
game_on said:
AnthonyW86 said:
curl-6 said:
Legitimate source or no credibility.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_gpu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSX_%27Reality_Synthesizer%27

All specifications of any gpu are listed there(PS4 and Xbox One have been updated not to long ago). You can check any tech site, they al list the same numbers.

Ok, you made the graphs yourself I asume.

Absolutely, we are at VGChartz remember.

But the PS3 has a CISC processor and the Xbox 360 a RISC. So comparing those two on operations per second and GFLOP seems a bit strange to me. Besides, it was always common knowledge that the PS3 is more powerful than the Xbox 360, so showing quite the opposite 8 years later?

 I'm not an technical expert (far from that), but I think that if it was this easy to compare consoles on a scale like this, graphs like this would show up more often.


PS3 in total package is stronger than X360, but taking just the graphics processor X360 is stronger...



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."