| RolStoppable said: At a first glance, there is no clear winner here. But giving it a second thought, Sony issued those statements from a position of dominance whereas Microsoft is doing so from the position of an also-ran. Therefore the level of arrogance is higher in Microsoft's case. |
If you takes that in account, I also think MS is clearly more arrogant. Sony was backed by 10 years of absolute domination of the console market.
If not, it really depend on what you compare. Sony was arrogant for a longer time, before and after release, especially about the power of the PS3 and its value. MS was quicker to react, and dropped about anything that didn't work mostly before release... but there arrogance peak was so high ! For the first few months after announce, it's like the client would just have to shut up and comply to their brillant strategy. I think Sony was very arrogant about their product and brand image, but MS was kind of arrogant against the client with an impressive list of unpopular features.







