mornelithe on 14 May 2014
| Capulous said: That's what you've been doing. Stating your opinion that the cost of the PS3 had nothing at all to do with the inclusion of blu-ray. I say it does. You have provided nothing to prove otherwise. Are you sure I'm the one with a reality problem? I do agree with the last part though. It is all good. |
Never said the cost of the Ps3 had nothing to do with Blu Ray, also never said the cost of the PS3 didn't have to do with XDR or the Cell Processor. What I did say is defining 'transferring costs to the consumer' by absorbing between 28 and 38 percent of the products BOM, isn't accurate. The profit made from Blu Ray, came nowhere close to covering the losses on the PS3. Not even remotely close.
