J_Allard said:
Isn't that just splitting hairs? "MS are terrific partners" and "MS was the only one willing to give the support we needed"? If I was of the mind to think the first comment was "disrespectful", I certainly would think the second was equally if not more disrespectful. More importantly, again, what do you think this actually means to Sony? Do you think Kaz or whoever runs SCEA now (assuming dumb ass Tretton is gone already, he might still be there) were angry when they read that? "Blah is an awesome partner" is pretty much the standard line given by any developer to their publisher. It's not like if Sony was thinking of doing another R&C, they'd blow Insomniac off because of this. |
I actually think the second option is less disrespectful, and yes in the end the message is basically the same but more polite.
And sure Sony High Execs aren't heart broken or mad at it, I'm not mad at them as well and I hope their game end up being great, just think they could have done a better job in the message.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







