Google upset at "Right to be forgotten"

[Kasz216]

kowenicki said:

kitler53 said:

kowenicki said:

kitler53 said:

 

as far as i'm concerned,.. so long as the linked article is actually factual that goes into our living history.  i don't want anyone censoring public records. 

e.g. - should all links to OJ simpsons murder trial be deleted?  he was found not guilty so that entire trial is "no longer relavant"?  should he be able to opt out of those search results?

The OJ Simpson thing falls under public interest.   CLEARLY it is also public record and in the public domain as seen in newspapers, tv shows and court records. 

You making an ass of yourself on some college based website with a stupid comment or lewd phtograph isn't public interest or public record.  Dont you think you should have the right to remove that?

The difference is very obvious and very stark.

I'd disagree on that.

It's public... for one.

Secondly, what if said person becomes a poltician, isn't public interest to know if he said something racist before?  Or something that suggests he has more radical views then he lets on?