Max King of the Wild said:
DarkD said:
English isn't your first language is it because you are clearly not understanding what I wrote....
You guys made me source my stuff, you source yours. Show me Sony saying that they weren't going to have stringent DRM on their system before E3. So that's your first two sentences proven crappy.
My sources claim that Sony made a last minute decision to not have DRM after they saw the crapfest it caused Microsoft. Its theory which is heavily substantiated by reliable news sources. Your whole post is so wrong simply because you don't understand English.... Don't argue when you can't speak the language...
|
Oh how cute you acting like a tough mean old bully. You sourced anonymous sources that claimed that the e3 presentation was a pr stunt and they were still implementing DRM. That turned out to be wrong. That source is now not credible. Once you site a source worth it's salt I will show you mine
|
Did you even read the website. It stated that it was a PR stunt and that sony ORIGINALLY intended to have DRM. That has not been disproven...
Ok I think I figured out where the BS is coming from. You're bugging me because you only read a small portion of the argument and have no clue what I am trying to substantiate here. Basically you walked in on an argument and thought "oh hey that doesn't sound right" and figured you'd enlighten me... Well keep your damned enlightenment.
The argument was whether I could substantiate that that developers were under the opinion that Sony was going to have DRM too. Thus when Sony announced they didn't have DRM, developers were pissed off. The only thing I am trying to prove is that developers thought that Sony was going to have DRM.
