By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

@ Torillian

Agreed, IMO reviewers should really investigate and poll around for second opinions for example within the family.

Professional reviewers should write reviews based on intended target. A sports fan may not like an unrealistic party game, FPS, racing game, etc. Personally I don't like any MLB, NBA or American Football game, but of course I shouldn't give a game like that a bad score if I was a professional reviewer, I must compare to other similar games and assume the reader does like such a sports game. If I had to write a review for such a game I would ask fans what previous games made them so fun and such try to imagine what I would or wouldn't like if I was a fan.

Too often I get the feeling their approach is more like: I don't like the game, well that's my opinion and deal with it. That's a too simple, worthless and unprofessional approach. First and foremost there needs to be consistency, you cannot drag a game like R&C: TOD through the dirt claiming the game to have a weak story just after having praised Gears of War in the past. (Looking at Gamespot guys, R&C story telling is leagues above Gears!)



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales