naruball said:
Please tell us how you guarantee that. Please, go ahead. I'm curious what inside information you have, because there is no other way you can make such a statement. Stabbed themselves in the back? In what way? Has EA announced games that are not coming to ps4? Has Activision? Any company that has not been moneyhatted by (or received funding from) MS? There is currently absolutely no public proof to back up your theory and all it comes off is wishful thinking. But, please prove me wrong with concrete evidence. |
There is no concrete evidence, this is a forum where we discuss opinions. If you are looking for concrete then go to first party sources because you can't ask for that with a straight face on a forum like this.... You should know that.
I say that Sony was supposed to have DRM as well because everyone seemed shocked that they didn't have it, including the developers. Everyone thought DRM was going standard this gen. It was an unpopular agreement that pretty much everyone agreed was going to happen. Look at the reaction to Sony announcing they weren't going the DRM route. Developers everywhere were dumbfounded by it. One developer even said something along the lines of "Microsoft didn't back out of DRM because of the whining fans, they did it because Sony forced them to. " I'm not gonna look up the damned quotes for you, if you care that much then go ahead.
My second point is just a theory based on the massive number of exclusives Microsoft has and the utterly piss-poor line-up of exclusives Sony has. Their best games are stuff that they stole from Nintendo's third party exclusives list and Japanese games which Microsoft has no hope in hell of gaining traction with. Its a theory grounded in my previous statement supported by the massive number of third party exclusives Microsoft has. I even state that it will either be proven true or false at E3 when the next years exclusives are announced. If its another Microsoft bonanza then that will be your proof.







