By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LurkerJ said:
DonFerrari said:
LurkerJ said:

And they delivered many games in return, more than any other first party studio. They expected SONY to grant them the IP rights. SONY didn't. The guy is stil butthurt over it and he said what he said.

I tough you said I was butthurt about the case... now that I understand the comment is because he may be butthurt over sony that is a possibility (not very professional any way), and I agree the partnership was good for Sony (don't know how good it was for Insominiac).

I am butthurt too. I want the PS4 to do well. Seeing people excited for this game makes me think SONY made a mistake. What I've seen from it didn't get me excited, personally. 


PS4 will do well, and would be good to keep good relations with Insominiac, but I do agree that Sony have been not aggressive on making deals for exclusivity on the release window of PS4, maybe they are trying to make sure PS4 is profitable from the get go and are cost advert.

Well maybe the game gets better, I like Insominiac and would like them to suceed.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."