By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
starcraft said:
theprof00 said:
While you have a point that ps4 doesn't have a diversified lineup at the moment, we've seen the past three generations where they had the most. If you expect that will change now, when their direction right out of the gate was to make a system for gamers, then I'm not going to try and change your mind.

I am sorry, but that just plain isn't true of generation 7.  It is a perception borne out of two things.  Sony offered quantifiable support to their console for perhaps 6-12 months longer than Microsoft (less if you factor in the fact the console has been out a year less) and Sony had - towards the end of the generation - more JRPGs.

Microsoft matched or exceeded Sony in every other notable genre - and had the JRPG title for the first few years to boot.  Sony had a fantastic library on PS3.  It is not even close to being a shoe-in over the 360's though.


Are even a moderator trying to condone the idea that MS have developed more 1st parties than Sony on 7 gen?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."