Can Microsoft win this generation?

[Qly]

Squilliam said:

Qly said:
I find it funny how xbox fanboys are trying to redefine the meaning of winning, just as nintendo fanboys did in the last generation
Winning is of course selling more machines, who is stupid enough to ask that question?
that being said you can still enjoy a loser console (fuck there were some great games for dreamcast...)
Hardware doesn't sell machines (look at wii and ds), software doesn't sell machines (poor dreamcast), you know what sells machines? HYPE
when you get a machine on the news so your grandpa sees it while he's watching larry f%$&* king that sells machines, when the dumb chics at fox news say they have a great time, that sells machines
Nobody has the recipe for hype... but nintendo nailed it on this generation, make your peace with that...

 

People tend to get what their friends have/say is good. Could you please stop being a fanboy?

Fanboy? i don't even own a fucking wii, frankly i don't have much money (living abroad, f*&^ing expensive europe) so I stick to my beloved ps2 for the moment

Go read some other posts i've made, some of them bash wii developpers, some ridiculize ps3 efforts but mostly i bash Halo

If i'm a fanboy then i don't know how to describe some people here

What I stated is a fact, wii outsells the other machines, I find it kinda hard to believe, but it does, perhaps it is because the average buyer is not an average gamer, he does not expect graphics to look like crysis, he does not care if his machine could break the CIA's cypher, all he wants is some dumb fun

Now i don't know if this is good or bad forus gamers, of course nintendo 1st and 2nd party games are actually ok, but most 3rd party developer titles are absolute and utter crap (capcom "may" be spared) PS360 games have much more depth, but perhaps ew gamers are not into that kind of stuff

You are not alone in the world, learn to live with that

Oh, and what does winning mean? seriously, who the fuck asks that?