By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kenzomatic said:
Andir said:
I still have yet to receive an answer as to why I "look like an ass" for asking a question about language.

kenzomatic said:
Andir said:

I did? Explain. Or is this the part where the religious call me a loon and try to discredit me because they cannot answer the question.


Did I call you a loon NO. You know what

"Forget it, Venkman! You had your chance to cooperate, but you thought it'd be more fun to insult me. Well, now it is my turn, wise ass."

Just lighten up.

And to answer you question it's because my question was in no way about religion but whether anyone else was bothered by the fact that in a would be documentry they keep saying BS. 

I thought I did answer but to expand

"If God created language (or the ability to speak | or created language THROUGH people) wouldn't all language be the word of God and therefore be acceptable, non-offensible? Also, we had another thread discussion where all the religious typesfailed to prove that if God created free will, then why can he not control it."

now givin your next post was

"Then you should go get yourself a prostitute.  Last time I had one, I experienced something good.  Don't deny my teachings, because they are the words of God, through me.  Or doesn't that apply to me?  It only applies to those that teach the same thing you believe in?"

I could only assume your first post was a jab and not a real question.

and for the record I do not like Penn I find him too much like Billy Mays.

On another note I would enjoy your thoughts on this and no I am not being sarcastic
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=21322&start=0#end


 No, it was a real question.  If everything God created is "of God" and therefore noble, then through man everything is noble by the strictest interpretation.  It goes back to the old question if God can create a mountain big enough that he cannot move... could he give us free will enough that he could not control it?  And if so, then I'd say he's not all powerful and that flies in the face of ALL teachings.  And you could give me the excuse that he chooses not to control it, but that in itself would tell me that he is fallable and human.  Another problem I have with the idea of God is that I cannot have proof of his existance.  Somehow Moses was deemed privelages enough to have a conversation with God, so apparently he's not too busy to chat with the likes of us.  Also, I am a bit ignorant in the fact that I didn't read the entire Bible and study it.  I don't care to, but I am pretty sure that the Bible says something about living only under the rules of God.  If you follow the speed limit, park only between the hours of 8pm and 2am, and drive on the right side of the road all the time, then you are follows the rules of man and not the only 10 rules you should live by.

And for the record, the Penn and Teller clip wasn't me, although it is the truth, wehter you like the language or not... which begs the question if language, created by humans as instruments of God can be considered "wrong."  The rule you live by, where you can't say shit, fuck, ass, et al in front of kids is NOT the ruling of God, but the ruling of man... and it flies in the face of the thought above.  I'm pretty sure I was talking about the picture of "Muscle Jesus" breaking the cross though... which yet is acceptable as a human interpretation of a situation that nobody has any real verifiable evidence, except one.  We all know that you CAN NOT trust one singular source for all your information... it breeds ignorance.



It seems the mods need help with this forum.  I have zero tolerance for trolling, platform criticism (Rule 4), and poster bad-mouthing (Rule 3.4) and you will be reported.

Review before posting: http://vgchartz.com/forum/rules.php