BMaker11 said:
Doesn't matter if you haven't played those games. You said that one of the reasons why most multiplats were "way inferior" was due to image quality. Unless you played most multiplats last gen to be able to make that statement? But considering there's over 600 games the PS3 and 360 share, I doubt that's true, so you can't fall back on "herp derp, I didn't play those games, so they are irrelevant LOL". You can make a generalization about multiplatform games last gen, even though you didn't play most of those games ......but now that the situation has been reversed, showing games that meets your criteria for "way inferior" don't count because....what's that? You haven't played these games? Even though by that same token, you were able to talk about last gen? Another example of your hypocritical flip flopping! But let me just give you the benefit of the doubt. Let's skip all the mental gymnastics you're doing to seem like you're being consistent, and just leave it up to only the games you've played. I dunno what your gametag is, but unless you've only played XBone exclusives so far, then chances are you've played a "way inferior" game, considering the vast majority (if not all) of multiplatform games out have had PS4 > XBone. But again.....that doesn't fit the anti-PS narrative you're trying to push. Go ahead and change the goalpost again, though. You're already 3 for 3 in being completely hypocritical. Be my guest and make it 4 for 4 |
It seems you still don't know what hypocritical means. I'm going to explain yet again why you are wrong here. Follow along.
1. I bought and played the inferior PS3 versions of CoD. It bothered me a little (because they were REALLY bad), but I did it anyway because that was where some of my CoD buddies/siblings were at. Now, where is the hypocrisy here? Even if I said I owned and played Ghosts on Xbone, why would it be hypocritical of me to own the inferior Xbone version, when last gen I owned inferior PS3 versions? Isn't this.. consistent? Isn't this.. the opposite of flip-flopping?
2. What games have been shown to meet "my criteria" for inferior? I listed a bunch of things that bothered me about CoD on PS3. You retort with some tiny Spider Man pics and pics of Ghosts that are actually brighter on Xbone and tbh shitty looking for both platforms. But again, where is there any hypocritical stuff here? Have I been on this board saying Ghosts is better on Xbone or something? Have I been actively playing and enjoying Spider Man on Xbone without knowing it?
3. Are you under some bizarre impression that I think the Xbone is more powerful than PS4 or something? That I don't know a lot of the MP games have better resolution on PS4? Can you please control+f the thread and find a post in here where I reference resolution? Take your time.
Look I have enjoyed this back and forth and I wish you'd continue because it's just been funny as hell to read but I am starting to feel bad. What I am going to do, since you don't know how to use hypocritical correctly in a sentence, is I am going to make you sort of an "Allard Hypocritical Cheat Sheet". Are you ready to begin? Ok.
In this thread I have expressed displeasure in playing CoD on PS3 due to:
- Slower matchmaking
- Shit voice quality
- Dark, muddled image quality (which I explained both PS3 and 360 had this issue with Ghosts)
- One month delay in DLC
- Longer load times, especially ridiculous on a couple of the games
Now, do you see that list? Feel free to print it out and use it as a reference. Now here's the fun part. If you ever see me on here praising a game and having a good time with no qualms whatsoever playing a game that has these issues on Xbox One and not on PS4, then you may reply crying about hypocrtical flip-flopping. Until then please pick your spots a little bit better.
Now, regarding the underlined, no. Like I said, you can have the last word there, I am done trying to help you. And now I am done trying to help you with hypocrite as well. Bye.
