By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r on 05 May 2014
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
fps_d0minat0r said:

If you are right, why would they bother with a wii U version if vita has nothing to pose a threat against it but mario zelda and pokemon do?

But youre wrong because if anyone wants an fps, they are not going to buy mario zelda or pokemon instead.

Vita version makes sense because it could be the best handheld version because vita is more powerful and has 2 analogue sticks.

wii U would basically be getting a watered down version of the PS4/X1, it wont sell, and nintendo fans will claim its because people like mario or zelda better when the truth is anyone who was interested in the game simple wasnt interested in the wii U version.

Games do not have to be in the same genre to compete. Any game people might buy instead is competition.

So  what's your reasoning, that devs all have a bias against the Vita, just because?

It's cheap to port COD to Wii U. They have a dedicated team for it. With VIta, likely not so easy.


Why? What makes you think porting to vita significantly harder than the wii U that the difference in sales wouldnt cover for it? It would be cheaper in the long run if they fired the dedicated wii U team and set up a dedicated vita team.

The vita has more RAM than the PS3 and it doesnt need a GPU as powerful because the resolution is only 960x544, and the developers can set the native resolution lower if required. Even if the game isnt locked to 60fps, no-one is gonna care because it will still the best handheld version. The same cant be said about the wiiU .

People will consider the ps3/360/X1/PS4/PC versions before they consider the wii U version. Thats the true reason why its not gonna sell on the wiiU, not because of mario or zelda.