By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I think the term "social contract"is one of the biggest lies in humanity to justify the creation of a state. Some people take state and society as the same but the first implies force and vinculation even if they dont have your consent.

I think that if you justify the existence of a state with liberty, you cannot do it basing the argumentation in a "contract" in which there isnt any will to sign in the first place, a forced contract

So no, I do not think there should be states, I would prefer private(meaning small communities or anything that isnt related to the state) association. I dont know if it would be convenient, but at least I think it wouldnt be wrong

 

Edit: My first language is spanish, so most of the words I used may not be the same in english. Just for you to take in consideration