mornelithe on 27 April 2014
| greenmedic88 said: The ownership of personal firearms means very little in the defense against a governing body that is perceived as being "out to get you." I say this as an individual who has served in the US armed forces and owns several personal firearms. They are not a deterrent against law enforcement who are simply doing their jobs. In this instance, it looks like we have a rancher who simply doesn't want to pay for his grazing rights on property he doesn't hold the grazing rights to. I don't see what that has to do with entertaining the thought of raising personal arms against local or federal government law enforcement. Being on the wrong side of the law is not a call to take up personal arms; that's not only ridiculous, but incredibly ill-advised. Does it make one a populist hero if they raise arms against an IRS tax auditor for failing to pay ten years' worth of back taxes? I don't think so. |
Yeah, I don't think people are championing around Wesley Snipes after his tax debacle lol.
