the right to bear arms and how it can be used to defend from big government

[mornelithe]

thranx said:

mornelithe said:

There is no scenario where they 'take' from the Federal Government.  Their only option is going a legal, peaceful route, where the land rights are transferred to the State. Otherwise, they'll simply get 'dealt' with.

 they take the land by force or legal means it does not matter. I never stated how they would, but I meant legally. that is why they had a multi state meeting about it, to plan how to legally take the land back. But failing that, I would be fine with them defending (like Bundy did) or retaking their land by force. States still have rights, and I would love for state vs feds rights to come to a head and for the feds to back down (as they should)

Yeah, that'll work out really well for them, I'm sure.  Part of me would absolutely LOVE to see them try.  The part who loves seeing Darwin Awards handed out to people who die for being idiots, that is.