Mr Khan said:
thranx said:
Mr Khan said:
The image i posted was a joke which you might not get (or might, if the rumors about Russia getting America's old sitcoms on TV are true), based on a TV character with the last name of Bundy.
As for the case in question, the BLM Officers have backed off their efforts to seize his cattle for the moment, but the government's not just going to let this guy get his way. There's all sorts of stuff they could do, though, like place a tax lien against his cattle making any proceeds from sale of the cattle go straight into the government's coffers (taking away the money the cattle could earn without having to physically take the cattle).
It would be better for all involved if they solved this peacefully, especially for the wives of the militiamen, as the militiamen apparently wanted to use them as meat shields?
Patriotism at work, folks.
|
I am curious if you have read Bundy's unededited qoute. After reading the full qoute I respect this man even more. he isn't a racist, but someone who has worked with and around people.
The BLM has not backed off from what I know, Haven't been reading too much on it though. Harry Reid has stated that he will get that land. The BLM is also possibly trying to take some land in Texas, good luck there. I was glad that western states already had a meeting planned to discuss this before it all happened. Hopefully these events will spure themn to action and get them to take control of land that is with in their state.
|
So how do we spin the part where they wanted to use the women as meat shields, eh? I want to see that one.
|
I haven't read that one. But for me, I dont care about the messenger, I care about the mesasge. The message is for the feds to let states take control. Doesn't matter to me if I did or did not like Bundy, the message is right. Why is it that people have to attack the messengar and not the message? Why should the feds control these lands? That is what should be being asked. Bundy stated why the state should have them, why cant the feds put their reasoning out there? If it was because of the turtles, why was the land sold for houses? why are the turtles now being killed by the government. More importantly, why is it that the news only story about this is that he is racisit? and that he wants to use women as meat sheilds? Why are we disussing that instead of who should control the land, feds or state? I guess the media has done its "job" on this one.
