the right to bear arms and how it can be used to defend from big government

[thranx]

mornelithe said:

thranx said:
I am curious if you have read Bundy's unededited qoute. After reading the full qoute I respect this man even more. he isn't a racist, but someone who has worked with and around people.

 

The BLM has not backed off from what I know, Haven't been reading too much on it though. Harry Reid has stated that he will get that land. The BLM is also possibly trying to take some land in Texas, good luck there. I was glad that western states already had a meeting planned to discuss this before it all happened. Hopefully these events will spure themn to action and get them to take control of land that is with in their state.

There is no scenario where they 'take' from the Federal Government.  Their only option is going a legal, peaceful route, where the land rights are transferred to the State. Otherwise, they'll simply get 'dealt' with.

 they take the land by force or legal means it does not matter. I never stated how they would, but I meant legally. that is why they had a multi state meeting about it, to plan how to legally take the land back. But failing that, I would be fine with them defending (like Bundy did) or retaking their land by force. States still have rights, and I would love for state vs feds rights to come to a head and for the feds to back down (as they should)