UltimateUnknown said:
I used more of the criteria that a lead of over 10 million or so would be considered highly dominant. But I think now that everyone's criteria of using the percentage marketshare is better. I'll say just dominant and that's really the question. |
That's just typical market behaviour. For any given product there will be a market leader and for many products the market leader is ahead by a long way. And this is irrespective of product quality. The better question is why do products, and services, in general tend to have a significant market leader when if you look objectively at things there isn't enough of a difference to really explain the level of dominance. Of course marketing and being the first cab off the rank usually helps a lot.
The interesting thing with consoles is that each generation is an unknown quantity especially when disruptive technology is introduced (CD and DVD with PS and PS2, waggle with Wii. So dominance from one product cycle to the next is less assured with consoles than with many other products. Which is the interesting thing.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix